Energy and the Economic Problem

Energy and the Economic Problem

This editorial from one of the Presidents at Econophysics is well worth reading. Especially for the interested in Science & Technology and its Economic relevance!

” Energy efficiency, not the falling price of solar, has done the heavy lifting when it comes to unlocking the economics of distributed clean energy for the poor. The reduced demand from LEDs brings the size, and therefore cost, of everything down from solar panel to the battery. Imagine if we took this lesson – energy efficiency unlocks distributed energy for the poor – and applied it to rural electrification as a whole? What you might come up with is a novel new approach to mini-grids dubbed by my colleague Stewart Craine of Village Infrastructure Angels ‘Skinny Grids.’ Two of the most pressing basic needs the poor have are for lighting and mobile phone charging (the latter coming from an unprecedented number of electrified mobile phone users – an enormous market opportunity. Serving those needs with yesterday’s technology (the incandescent bulb and even
CFLs) is very tough. So tough it has basically meant the economics to serve these markets with clean energy didn’t work.
Enter the LED. Advances in LED white lighting have revolutionized the amount of power poor households now need. That changes everything from component to system size which has cut costs dramatically. For example, the light supplied by 100W of incandescent bulbs can now be met with just 5W of well designed LED lighting. Since a phone charger takes similar power, we can now provide basic services with 90% less power. What is far less explored is the impact beyond the individual solar home system. That’s because the drop in demand lowers the current in the “poles and wires” that connect households in conventional grids. This enables companies to use much thinner and cheaper wiring. Combined with smaller poles and longer spans, or locally dug underground trenches, the cost per household for reticulated wiring can be vastly reduced via thin-cable designs not previously imagined – our aptly named Skinny Grids. Combine this with innovative 1-2kV transformers that take this lower power and current as core to their design and Skinny Grids could reach households 5-10km from power sources quite cost-effectively. That means they could service many hundreds of households if we ran them from existing off-grid sources of power (think Tower Power) or from the edge of the grid.
In some countries, over 95% of all households are within 5-10km of an off-grid telecom tower or the edge of the grid, and these towers are often grossly under loaded compared to the power demand for the tower (eg. 3kW load compared to 15kW installed capacity). That means the power generation to connect 10-20W of load per household may already exist for the majority of the unelectrified population. Even better, the only investment needed is $1/m of Skinny Grid connections.
Think about that for a minute. All the handwringing about the massive energy investments and grid expansion that’s needed to electrify the world may be obviated (at least in part) by existing power sources that just haven’t been tapped. All of that thanks to the LED light bulb. Many of the entrepreneurs believe that their innovations will boomerang to traditional grids in developed and developing country markets. Skinny grids seem closest to fitting that prediction given that fact that the LED is to the off grid market what the CFL is to those in the on-grid market. The future for highly innovative clean energy deployment may be off the grid. ”